GOOGLE VS MOONSHOT AI

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Kimi K2.6

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is about 3.0x cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on a blended 3:1 input:output rate — the same 10K-in/2K-out request costs $0.0055 vs $0.0175. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has the larger context window (1,048,576 vs 262,144 tokens).

Pricing verified

API pricing per 1M tokens

ModelInput / 1M tokensOutput / 1M tokensBlended (3:1 mix)
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite$0.25$1.50$0.563
Kimi K2.6$0.95$4.00$1.713

Rates from official Google pricing and official Moonshot AI pricing, checked 2026-08-11.

What a real workload costs

Example: one request with 10,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens, then that request at 100,000 runs per month.

ModelPer request (10K in / 2K out)Per month (100K requests)Monthly delta
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite$0.0055$550—
Kimi K2.6$0.0175$1,750+$1,200

Model your own prompt sizes and volumes in the token cost analyzer, or check caching savings with the prompt caching calculator.

Specs side by side

SpecGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteKimi K2.6
ProviderGoogleMoonshot AI
Context window1,048,576 tokens262,144 tokens
Model classGeneral textGeneral text
TokenizerProprietary (counts estimated)Proprietary (counts estimated)

Count tokens for each model on its own page: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite token counter and Kimi K2.6 token counter. All Google models are on the Gemini Token Counter. All Moonshot AI models are on the Kimi Token Counter.

FAQ

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Kimi K2.6 FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite or Kimi K2.6?

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is cheaper. At rates checked 2026-08-11, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite costs $0.25 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens, while Kimi K2.6 costs $0.95 input / $4.00 output — about a 3.0x difference on a typical 3:1 input-heavy workload.

How much does a real request cost on Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Kimi K2.6?

A request with 10,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens costs about $0.0055 on Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and $0.0175 on Kimi K2.6. At 100,000 such requests per month that is $550 vs $1,750 — a difference of $1,200 per month.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite or Kimi K2.6?

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite. It supports 1,048,576 tokens of context versus 262,144 tokens — roughly 786,000 English words in one request.

Do Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Kimi K2.6 count tokens the same way?

Not exactly. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite uses a proprietary tokenizer (counts are estimates) and Kimi K2.6 uses a proprietary tokenizer (counts are estimates). The same prompt will tokenize differently, which shifts effective cost per word.